Español
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Ecuadorian Amazon has historically been portrayed as a territory of exceptional biodiversity and cultural richness, while simultaneously being framed as a strategic space for economic development through oil extraction. These tensions intensified in the context of the Popular Consultation of August 2023, during which citizens voted on the continuity of extractive activities in the Yasuní ITT block. The present study seeks to analyze the perceptions of university students in Ibarra regarding the Ecuadorian Amazon and to examine the influence of traditional mass media and the social network TikTok on the formation of these perceptions and on voting decisions. From a quantitative perspective, a structured survey was administered to a sample of 710 students from two higher education institutions —one public and one private. Findings indicate that the Amazon is predominantly perceived as a space of biodiversity, although representations associated with economic development and resource exploitation remain present. Furthermore, differences were identified in media framing: whereas traditional outlets tend to reinforce narratives aligned with extractivism and economic progress, TikTok emerges as a platform for youth-driven environmental activism with a strong orientation toward conservation. Nevertheless, the influence of this digital platform on voting behavior appears to be moderate. The study concludes that the digital public sphere is reshaping processes of meaning-making concerning socio-environmental conflicts, although it has not entirely displaced the influence of traditional media discourses.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Con la finalidad de contar con un tipo de licencia más abierta en el espectro que ofrece Creative Commons, a partir de diciembre de 2022 desde el número 27, AXIOMA asume la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Tanto el sitio web como los artículos en sus diferentes formatos, reflejan esta información.
![]()
Hasta el mes de noviembre de 2022 con el número 26, la revista AXIOMA asumió una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Los artículos contenidos en cada número hasta el 26, cuentan con esta licencia y su descripción se conserva en el portal de nuestra revista.
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
CC BY-NC-ND
AXIOMA- Revista Científica de Investigación, Docencia y Proyección Social
References
Hernández Rentería (2020)
(Stoessel & Scarpacci, 2021)
(Davidov, 2013)
Velasco Ayala (2020)
(Córdoba Cárdenas, 2024)
(Larrea, 2024)
(Paz Cardona, 2024)
Castells (2009)
Cornejo Urbina (2022)
Berger y Luckmann (1968)
(Entman, 2004)
Aruguete (2021)
(Goffman, 1974)
Muñiz (2020)
Mila Maldonado et al. (2024)
Scolari (2015)
Masip et al. (2019, p. 4)
Civila et al. (2020)
Becerra y Waisbord (2021)
Literat y Kligler-Vilenchik (2023)
(Polanía et al., 2020)
Neill et al. (2018)