Focus group and discussion groups as qualitative techniques for the creation of spaces for dialogue and debate in the revitalization of languages

Main Article Content

Viviana Torres
Daniel Diaz
Daqui Lema
María Fernanda Ibadango
Kelly Manosalvas

Abstract

This research has been carried out to find ways to make learning the Kichwa language more dynamic and effective in a sector of the Imbabura province. In the first phase of the investigation, the conditions under which Kichwa is taught in two intercultural bilingual institutions (Kichwa-Spanish) were inquired into, where relevant quantitative data such as the difference in Kichwa dialects were obtained, between the teaching text and the mother tongue used by teachers and students of Kichwa in the sector, which causes their disagreement. Furthermore, it was considered pertinent to execute various qualitative techniques such as the Focus Group and the Discussion Groups, to achieve, through this methodological triangulation, contrasted results regarding the “methodological strategies for teaching this ancient language” (original subject of the research) in the bilingual intercultural educational system. Already in practice, in the focus group, (vocalized in Kichwa 80% -Spanish 20%) in which various cultural actors, Kichwa activists and expert authorities in the area, convened on the occasion of the International Year of Indigenous Languages, promoted by the United Nations, presented experiences, points of view and suggestions that answered two specific questions; the first on the status or prestige of ancestral languages, and the second on the state of language in the educational curriculum. At a later time, round tables or discussion groups were formed to talk about interculturality as a concept, involving and regulating everything previously stated, sealed with the signing of a manifesto, with the commitment to continue working to find the best strategies for teaching Kichwa. Once the results obtained have been analyzed, it is concluded that it is necessary and urgent to design a methodological proposal, in order to optimize the strengths suggested in the GF and the GD. In this way, the role of the academy and the need to create spaces for dialogue and debate for the preservation of ancestral languages are recognized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
TorresV., DiazD., LemaD., IbadangoM. F., & ManosalvasK. (2020). Focus group and discussion groups as qualitative techniques for the creation of spaces for dialogue and debate in the revitalization of languages. AXIOMA, (22), 62-68. Retrieved from https://pucesinews.pucesi.edu.ec/index.php/axioma/article/view/601
Section
EDUCACIÓN
Author Biographies

Viviana Torres, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra. Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación. Ibarra-Ecuador.

Daniel Diaz, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra. Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación. Ibarra-Ecuador.

Daqui Lema, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra. Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación. Ibarra-Ecuador.

María Fernanda Ibadango, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra. Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación. Ibarra-Ecuador.

Kelly Manosalvas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra. Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación. Ibarra-Ecuador.

References

Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (2008). Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas. Publicado por las NNUU.
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de Ecuador (2008): Constitución de la República del Ecuador para reemplazar la Constitución Política de 1998. Ciudad Alfaro, Montecristi, Ecuador.
Barriga, F., Hernández, G. (2010). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Una interpretación constructiva. Tercera Edición. México. MCGRAWHILL
Bonilla-Jiménez y Escobar (2017). Grupos focales: una guía conceptual y metodológica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología, Vol. 9 nº 1, 51-67
Bourdieu (1983). Campo de poder, campo intelectual. Itinerario de un concepto. Montressor.
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (2013) Las estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Manual de investigación cualitativa. Volumen III. Barcelona España. Editorial GEDISA.
Gutiérrez, J. (2011). Grupo de Discusión: ¿Prolongación, variación o ruptura con el focus group? Cinta moebio 41: 105-122.
Haboud, M. (2005). Quichua ecuatoriano: entre el poder simbólico y el poder real. Encuentros Y Conflictos Bilingüismo Y Contacto De Lenguas En El Mundo Andino (13-38).
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (2010): Censo 2.010. Población y vivienda; una historia para ver y sentir. Quito.
Kowii, A. (2005). Identidad lingüística de los pueblos indígenas de la región andina. Quito-Ecuador. Ediciones Abya-Yala
Mackey, A., Gass, S. (2008). Second language research. Methodology and Design. New York. London. ROUTLEDGE.
Melrose, R. (2015). The communicative syllabus. A Systematic Functional Approach to Language Teaching. Bloomsbury Academic Collections.
Odello, M. (2012). El derecho a la identidad cultural de los pueblos indígenas de América: Canadá y México. Madrid. UNED Publicaciones.
Richards, J., Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Third edition. Cambridge University Press.
Rodríguez, D. Carrasquillo, Á. Lee, K. (2014). The bilingual advantage. Promoting Academic Development, Biliteracy, and Native Language in the Classroom. New York and London. Teachers College Press.
Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo - Senplades (2017). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2017-2021. Quito - Ecuador.